To extend a conversation from Gitter and to collect more opinions and advice, I’m opening a discussion here about how to best handle images that appear as part of a blog post in terms of serving high resolution images (@2x) to retina screens and normal resolution images to regular screens - the infamous progressive image.
@rhukster posted this article reference to Gitter and it’s one that I’ve read http://alistapart.com/article/responsive-images-in-practice. See this one, too: http://css-tricks.com/responsive-images-youre-just-changing-resolutions-use-srcset/.
He’s right to point out that there are a ton of complexities inherent in this whole concept and that universally agreed-to approaches have been missing on the web. However, with the introduction of srcset and picture as real HTML concepts, maybe we’re at the point of having a “standard” and something that Grav could provide.
The problem comes in that you can’t easily specify the HTML markup desired in the context of writing up a blog post with Markdown. Yes, Markdown allows raw HTML, so in theory you could do wh ,atever you wanted, but I don’t think many want to write all the necessary HTML markup in their Markdown blog post.
Right now, if you write Markdown like this:
![Grav Icon](/user/data/images/blog/apps/grav-symbol.jpg)
you get HTML like this:
<img alt="Grav Icon" src="/user/data/images/blog/apps/grav-symbol.jpg">
I wonder if Grav’s Media Actions could be expanded to allow Markdown like this:
![Grav Icon](/user/data/images/blog/apps/grav-symbol.jpg?src=grav-symbol-medi um.jpg, grav-symbol-large.jpg&srcset=1000,2000)
to emit HTML like this:
<img src="grav-symbol.jpg"
srcset="src=grav-symbol-medium.jpg 1000w, grav-symbol-large.jpg 2000w"
alt="Grav Icon">
And nevermind that there’s a grav-symbol.svg file available!