sorry for my bad english first. Second is, that i work with grav just one week and i am new with markdown and ?Twig? and so on. I choosed grav, because i am strong 55+ and i like to work on pages with ssh and vi in terminal. OK, i build a small site with too grav instances, because it`s not easy for me to understand your routing, cache, slug and so on. Here they are:
www.baiersbronn.jetzt with admin panel based on skeleton big-picture
www.baiersbronn.jetzt/blog with admin panel based on skeleton clean-blog
everything is up to date, caching and Apache deflate (Compression) is ready and my question is about the big size of my image in cache:
And: because i am a newbie i can put just one pic in my post. If you want to see the images, you have to put the url together for your own:
original Pic. is 2000x1100 Px and 381234 Bytes:
www . baiersbronn . jetzt
Pic in Cache is 2000x1100 Px and 852702 Bytes, twice as big and Extension .jpeg (?)
www . baiersbronn . jetzt
In the 2 Backends the quality of images is set to 100%, because in older days you made the work with your images before they come into the internet. Bye the way, the google page speed test for this site with all caching and compression ist sooooooo poor:
Desktop: Low: 29/100
Mobile: Medium: 71/100
OK, any suggestions to improve speed and quality? My work with the pictures at home was worthless:
Original: 3264 x 2448 px and 3,3MB online with 2000x1100px and 381234 Bytes.
Where does the 85% Quality of pictures come from which is the default im Backend?
Is there a way to serve the original Image without any ?? Manipulation or Optimaziation ?? from grav? What abaut a way to serve different qualities of one image with sourceset and so on?
Just one sentence and i have finished. Because i am a newbie my first goal was to get the site running, because there are differences between Ubuntu 16.04 at home and the situation online by my webhoster (curl_exec() has been disabled for security reasons and so on). In Case of /home and /blog with the 2 instances of grav at baiersbronn.jetzt i choose the same picture for the starting point of home and blog. The impression when you see the pic is surprising different. In case of /blog the quality is good, in case of /home the quality is poor. OK, the section is bigger in the case of /home, but i am thinking about the background of this all. Is this the choosen skeleton (shure when you think about the section), but maybee there are other reasons in presentation of images as center or spread which i can use, to get the best optical impression for the user.
Best regards from blackwood forrest:-)